Video

http://youtu.be/ToCu3Y7LTiw

Individual Contribution

Group Role

In Geriambience group, my main work is to build the liveable bathroom in the virtual world. Between the design part and programming part, my part is quite important to combine with other two parts. I must had changed some data or model if design part need improved this model,  then I need finish it in a short time to make that programming part have enough time to change the code or program.

Timetable

week 2 disscuss the back brief

week 3 check australian standard and provide the database to Laura

week 4 Export some test file from Sketchup to Cryengine

Easter Break Export the First Rough Sketchup Model

week 6 Keep Exporting the rough sketchup model, Find and make some Sketchup model to build the whole city with Dan 

week 7 Discuss with Laura and change the design. then export the new sketchup model

week 8 Finish the exporting of the developed sketchup model

week 9 Renew a few model in cryengine to hlep Dan do the change of material.

week 10 Do some basic flowgraph in Cryengine.

week 11 Rebuild the whole environment.Using some models to make the town look like Australian Style city.

week 12 Look the UI tutorial. And do the video of the whole environment.

Week 13 Group Presentation

Individual Work

For my individual work, I had export the three houses from the sketchup to Cryengine. After the first exporting of the model, we had discus with the tutor, and Laura thought she must change the design. So, I need to renew all the model in Cryengine in a short term because the third part-programming need our Cryengine File to test their program. For the whole virtual world except these three houses, Dan and I had built an Australian style city. Because we didn’t pay attention to the style of the city, we also build the city again by download some model and change the material of such models. Finally , I had built some basic FlowGraph in the Cryengine.

Provide the database which from Australia Standard to Laura.

Top view of three houses. From the left to right the order is medium,small,large.

The top two images are the final project. The bottom image show the structure after the first exporting.The difference between the first exporting and the final project is that the location of  kitchen and  living room is changed.And some furnitures are changed.

Outside View of house.

Kitchen

Living Room

Large Toilet

Medium Toilet

Small Toilet

There are too many objects in one level, and this list could help me find  the specific object.Then I can move it or change it .

Give every object a unique name, then I can find it easier. And the programming part  also could save time to  find the project.

Reverse faces of some objects.And objects could show each  surface in cryengine.

Export the Gas Satation.

The models under the red range is edit by me.

This images show some Australian style houses and apartments we used in the  CryEnginge3.These models were searched by me and exported and edited by Dan Zhang.

The basic Flow Graph of handbasin, toilet door and shower nozzle is design by me.

                                                         http://youtu.be/ToCu3Y7LTiw
This is the link of the whole environment in CryEngine3, and the change of some objects.

Group Reflection

For our group, because of a little speech block, we don’t discuss much more like other group. But we could try our best and use our skill to finish our project, not just be all talk and no deed. Finally we successfully combine everyone’s skill in this project. During this semester, this studio teach me how to collaborate every members’ skill and finish the group project in a good way.

Presentation Reflection-week11

Group Presentation 5:Remuneration(Group Name:Vivid)
Grade:PS
Assessment Criteria
Clarity Of The Oral Presentation_Does the oral presentation communicate a clear,concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?
This presentation is quite oppressive and like read their note of this topic.
Clarity Of The Written Presentation_Does the written presentation communicate a clear,concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?
Audience could get a easy understanding by the written presentation.
Distinctiveness And Specificity Of The Examples_Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific?
They prove some interesting and easy examples to audience.
Referencing_Are all sources of content properly referenced?
Yes.
The Conceptual Context_Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?
They need find some specific examples of this topic.
The Still Image_Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?
Most of the images cannot support their topic.

Presentation Reflection-Week 10

Group Presentation 4:Conflict(Group Name:DCLD)
Grade:CR
Assessment Criteria
Clarity Of The Oral Presentation_Does the oral presentation communicate a clear,concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?
Some of the group member just read their notes, and look like not familiar with their presentation.
Clarity Of The Written Presentation_Does the written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?
They have simple and clear written presentation.
Distinctiveness And Specificity Of The Examples_Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific?
Although they give us some good example of Conflict. They haven't combine this topic with their design project.
Referencing_Are all sources of content properly referenced?
Yes.
The Conceptual Context_Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?
They give us some general example and different types of conflict.
The Still Image_Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?
The images are not good to combine with their topic.

Group Presentation 4:Conflict(Group Name:Kinecting the boxes)
Grade:CR
Assessment Criteria
Clarity Of The Oral Presentation_Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?
The group members do more read of their material than present their topic in their own way.
Clarity Of The Written Presentation_Does the written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?
They got a good written presentation. And we can get more information from their writting.
Distinctiveness And Specificity Of The Examples_Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of  collaboration distinctive and specific?
Less example of their topic.
Referencing_Are all sources of content properly referenced?
Yes.
The Conceptual Context_Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?
They should give more examples to explain their topic. And combine the topic with their design project.
The Still Image_Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?
There were less image in the whole presentation.